Talk:Josephine Flood

Untitled
I have rewritten the longer passages of duplicate text - some of these however are just titles of publications and organisation, and others are simply logical phrases - e.g."more than 2000 Aboriginal sites on the Register of the National Estate". Garyvines (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

copyvio
I thought I had pretty much gotten rid of any copyright text and applied the duplication detector to the result, which showed only three word strings and references;, but I have now rewritten the sections at issue and reposted the article here Talk:Josephine Flood/Temp as instructed.Garyvines (talk) 10:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reworking the text. Copyright issues go beyond precise duplication - Close paraphrasing may be helpful reading here. We can inadvertently come too close to our sources when we modify sentences incrementally instead of, as requested, rewriting from scratch. I have modified a bit further but believe that what we have now is not an issue for copyright.


 * However, it does have some issues with sourcing. The bulk of sources cited in this article are primary sources, authored by Flood herself or by entities connected to her (the university where she taught). Wikipedia's content is meant to be primarily based on secondary and tertiary sources. We prefer sources that are subjected to scrutiny and review before publication and that are respected and widely trusted as reliable and neutral. I have altered the language "Flood is credited with" as the source cited for that information is Flood herself. If Flood is credited with this discovery (and she may well be) by others, please cite the sources that indicate as much. I have also flagged that source 10 may not meet our requirements for sourcing; please see identifying reliable sources. While we do sometimes cite websites created and owned by individuals, we generally need to establish that they are respected experts in the field.