Talk:Josh Bornstein

talmud article
it looks very clear to me that this article was not written by josh bornstein. not only does it use a lot of /pol/ memes, theres also this: http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/42271853/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skairim (talk • contribs) 16:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

This is a promotional piece of marketing fluff
This should be deleted. There is nothing noteworthy about the subject of the article: no landmark cases, no academic distinctions, no important legal publications. Nothing but involvement in some parochial Australian court cases that have no wider significance. This belongs in the 'About Us' section of the promotional website of a legal firm not in Wikipedia. AnotherPseudonym (talk) 10:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)