Talk:Josh Duggar/Archive 4

RfC - "Accused sex offender" -> "charged with child pornography offences"
wp:BLPCRIME states editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured. As Duggar is a notable individual, but has not yet been definitively convicted, it seems appropriate that the precise nature of the charges are made directly in the lede. The vague "accused sex offender" terminology whilst succinct, does not appropriately balance the importance of A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law, whilst at the same time, including wp:DUE weight on the extremely notable and thoroughly covered allegations criminal activity.69.172.145.94 (talk) 17:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC)