Talk:Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Please do not view the edits of this day as approval
I don't like this work any better than most here, but a one-sided scree that fails to describe the subject is not encyclopedic.

The journal description should be objective, allowing the subject to stand or fall of it own accord.

To remove some apparent bias in the foregoing presentation, I have simply started to add factual info to the opening of the article.

Please, if you are interested, add Wikilinks to the list of subjects covered, and that should do any reader the just they need to understand the niche that this journal fills.

Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 21:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)