Talk:Journal of Speculative Philosophy

Ambiguity
Since there are two JSPs (one 1867-1893, the other 1987-present), shouldn't there be two articles?173.72.63.150 (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)The Honourable Ronald Adair
 * Given that we hardly have anything to tell about the older journal, I don't see much problem in a combined article. The distcnction is sufficiently clear that things are not ambiguous. --Randykitty (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * "...we hardly have anything to tell about the older journal...." Why? The older journal is overflowing with interesting articles. To anyone interested in Idealism, they are a treasure.173.72.63.150 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2014 (UTC)The Honourable Ronald Adair
 * If there are sources that talk about all those "interesting articles" in-depth, then we can include that in an article about the journal. In the absence of such sources, "we hardly have anything to tell about the older journal". --Randykitty (talk) 02:37, 14 May 2014 (UTC)