Talk:Joyful, Joyful/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 15:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Review

 * Lead
 * Good. It could be rewritten to be a little more clear but that's just a recommendation.
 * Fixed some minor mistakes there.
 * Background
 * Great
 * Composition
 * Great, although i think it could be made a little bit longer.
 * Critical reception and performance
 * Great, although i think those could be better as subsections of "Reception".
 * Credits
 * Good.
 * Charts
 * Good.
 * References.
 * Good.

The article is great. It passes the criteria. Cheers! — Hahc 21  20:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)