Talk:Juan Martín del Potro/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'll be reviewing this article for GA. Nat91 (talk) 20:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * I've had a go at this. Spiderone  19:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I copyedited a bit too. For GA, it's okay. Nat91 (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * I don't know what else needs mentioning. Spiderone  19:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The lead wasn't working for me, to be honest. As I mentioned above, the second paragraph had too many information not suitable for an article lead. It wasn't attrating me as a reader and summarising why the person is notable. I put some work into it. Nat91 (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * I don't think there is anything in the lead that isn't already sourced in the main article. Spiderone  06:21, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I know everything in the lead tends to be cited throughout the article, but it is better for leads to be cited too. Nat91 (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * I'll try and replace it if possible. Spiderone  06:21, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * I couldn't find a source to say he considered retirement Spiderone  18:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, he was very discouraged by his injuries at that time. While I couldn't find a source in English either, I added something about the problems he had regarding injuries - among other additions. Nat91 (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * B. Focused:
 * This is difficult. He didn't receive much attention from the English-speaking media until 2008 so all quotes would have to be recent ones. Spiderone  20:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not really that difficult. I added the ones I considered most important for now (winning his first tournaments, the USO, his coach's influence). Although I admit I knew where to find most things since I'm a tennis fan myself! :) Nat91 (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * --Nat91 (talk) 04:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, after Spiderone's work and my final contributions, I believe the article is suitable for GA. Good work! Nat91 (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * --Nat91 (talk) 04:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, after Spiderone's work and my final contributions, I believe the article is suitable for GA. Good work! Nat91 (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * --Nat91 (talk) 04:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, after Spiderone's work and my final contributions, I believe the article is suitable for GA. Good work! Nat91 (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)