Talk:Juan Perón/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hello. I am going to have to fail this article GA nomination. Here is a list of the major issues I found with this article:
 * My biggest concern is the lack of references. There are large swaths of the article, for example most of the Exile section, that are unreferenced, as well as many other paragraphs and partial paragraphs. References are especially important when talking about such a controversial and powerful figure.
 * There should not be external links in the text of the article itself, for example in the 9th paragraph of the Domestic policy and first term section
 * In line links to other language wikis, such as the link to the Spanish wiki in the second and fourth paragraphs of the Domestic policy and first term section, are also frowned upon. If there is no article for this group in the English wiki, either create one or leave it as a red link.
 * Web references need to be formatted with titles, publishers and access dates. They should never be left as bare links. Refs not in English should be marked with their language.
 * Journal references (i.e, the National Geo refs that are #8 and 9) need to have full information - article name, author, etc.
 * References should be consistently formatted. Currently, most use no template, one uses a template from the "cite xxx" (i.e. cite web, cite journal, cite book) family and one uses a "citation" template. They need to be consistently formatted using one of the three types.
 * What makes Ref #18 (Perón y la educación) reliable? It appears to be a blog.
 * Ref #27 (Eduardo Galeano) deadlinks.
 * The External links section has a cleanup tag that has been in place since August 2008. The first and last external links deadlink.

This is just a quick list of the issues I found with the article. I did not check the article for prose, NPOV, completeness or images. I would suggest that the nominator complete some significant work on the article (at the moment, I believe they have made a total of one edit to the article) before renominating it. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)