Talk:Judah Leib Ben-Ze'ev/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 06:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. Hopefully we will start anon. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC) 

Observations

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Please see MOS:REPEATLINK. There are a number of duplicate links and irrelevant links.
 * knowledge of Hebrew philology = over linking. We don't need links to Hebrew (nor philology) here, it is already stated he is a scholar revitalising the usage of Hebrew as a written language.
 * In 1787 he moved to Berlin, then the centre of the Haskalah movement. Over linking. We don't need a link to Berlin. Haskalah is already linked in the infobox.
 * became friends with the Me'assefim and → already linked in the lede
 * links to Syriac and Greek are superfluous
 * in Vienna as proofreader in the Hebrew presses → Vienna, proofreader, presses do not need links.
 * German revision of his Talmud by Salomon Jacob Cohen appeared in Berlin  → Berlin does not need a link. Nor does Vilnius.
 * was translated into Italian by Leon Romani → Italian is a common word, does not need a link; ditto Russian in the same sentence.


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 *  and received a traditional religious education. This sentence links to Jewish education. The text should say this. Simply 'religious education' is misleading.
 * Good work on references.


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Appropriate coverage of Ze'ev's contrbutions to Me'assefim and his role in the Haskalah revival of the Hebrew language.
 * Linking to Graf-Wellhausen is excellent, as it places Ze'ev most properly as a Hebrew critic using Historical criticism.
 * Jewish Virtual Library says that he was basically a failure as a poet?


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Yes, NPOV is presented.


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article created on 90 November 2020;
 * 42 edits from 3 editors;
 * 168 page views last 90 days.
 * No edit wars, article is considered stable.


 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Judah Leib Ben-Ze'ev.png = in the public domain in its country of origin;
 * Ben Zeev Talmud.JPG = is in the public domain in its country of origin


 * 1) Overall:
 * This is a good article, not over-written, sharp and concise.
 * There are excessive links in the article; when these are corrected (and the education reference) the article would achieve Good Article status. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review! I've gone ahead and implemented the recommended changes. –Kyuko (talk) 14:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your corrections. Article passed! --Whiteguru (talk) 22:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)