Talk:Judd, for the Defense

Original Research
This article states: "Throughout the course of the two-year run of the show, there were never enough viewers to establish Foreman's claim [that the show appropriated his legal career for commercial purposes], although critics gave it positive reviews. Undoubtedly the skittishness of viewers was a result of the program's dealing with then-taboo (though contemporary) subjects such as homosexuality, blacklisting, and draft dodgers, with open-ended conclusions in many episodes." The first claim appears to be nonsense - what does the success of the show have to do with whether it "stole" details of a lawyer's career for commercial purpose? Be that as it may, both claims appear to be the author's opinion rather than based upon any sources - hence, would appear to violate Wiki policy against original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.14 (talk) 11:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judd, for the Defense. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070816115147/http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/lpop/tv/tvlawyers-alpha.html to http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/lpop/tv/tvlawyers-alpha.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)