Talk:Jude Doyle

Comment
Several years ago, an article on Doyle was created, then deleted by AfD as not having adequate sources at the time. An article was later (re)created by someone with new and more sources (which I added to). Later, it was tagged for speedy deletion under A7, which was declined. Still later it was tagged for speedy deletion under G4, and several months ago it was deleted per G4 on the basis of the prior AfD (without obvious indication of consideration of the new sources and content which make the article sufficiently different that G4 does not apply). I see an article has now been recreated, again in a sufficiently different and expanded and better-referenced form that G4 does not apply AFAICT, and I have also expanded it with other former content, which had been draftified at User:-sche/Sady Doyle; that page should be histmerged into this one if an admin has time. (And if anyone thinks the article still lacks enough sources, I submit that a new AfD seems like the proper venue for making that case.) -sche (talk) 22:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)