Talk:Judicial system of Singapore

Requested move 26 April 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Steel1943  (talk) 23:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Judicial system of Singapore → Judiciary of Singapore – Standardizing the names of main articles in Category:Judiciaries. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC) relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 13:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose ambiguous naming judiciary means the body of judges. While "judicial system" clearly refers to the judicial system and not the body of judges -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 12:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Support: its actually a rather logical move. "Judiciary" means the entire system, not just judges. Its more succinct and can be made uniform across other nation's judiciary pages. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Alternative suggestion: As 70.51.46.195 pointed out, the content of this article is really more about the judicial system than the body of judges. I notice that one of the subcategories of "Category:Judiciaries" is "Category:Court systems by country". Perhaps this article should be renamed "Court system of Singapore"? However, if all the articles named "Judiciary of [country]" in fact cover both the court system and the judiciary, then I have no objection to the proposal to rename the article. — SMUconlaw (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose as ambiguous in Commonwealth English. This raft of proposals to rename all of the articles in a one-size-fits-all approach seems rooted in an attempt to apply American terminology worldwide without reference to the various kinds of systems in place. RGloucester  — ☎ 15:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Judicial system of Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/non_version/cgi-bin/cgi_retrieve.pl?actno=REVED-322&doctitle=SUPREME+COURT+OF+JUDICATURE+ACT%0A&date=latest&method=part
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p%3Bident%3D172f4d6d-7909-4389-819d-57006fa99f12%3Bpage%3D0%3Bquery%3DDocId%3A%22cf2412ff-fca5-4a64-a8ef-b95b8987728e%22%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0%3Brec%3D0
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110521100223/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gIkKvk-YnNQ1HVb2n_HUUMhncDLA to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gIkKvk-YnNQ1HVb2n_HUUMhncDLA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)