Talk:Judith Clute

Reviewer Note
The subject appears to be notable. It is the work of a paid editor, and it is not obviously the work of a paid editor. I am accepting it, but am tagging it as containing paid contributions so that another editor will review it. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi I don't see any significant coverage in independent sources. amandapalmer.bandcamp.com/? raftalondonstory is a blog, temporary-culture is her publisher, salonfutura is a blog, thames-sidestudios is an online store, nybooks.com looked promising, but only uses her work as an illustration  and walks.com has "Guided by Judith". How does any of this establish that the subject s notable? Vexations (talk) 22:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Vexations - It appears that I was being sloppy in my reviewing, in that I wasn't looking for third-party coverage. I think that the subject is notable, but that this article doesn't establish her notability.  So if you propose it for deletion, I will not remove the PROD tag, and the originator should not remove the tag, but should instead try to improve the article.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi I am - the person who drafted the article. I see you said above that the 'orginator' should try to improve the article. Is that referring to me? If so, what kind of content in particular would improve the article?

Hello and. This is. I got mixed up and made a mistake when submitting the article. I was not paid for the creation of this article. As a result, is it possible to get the paid contributor tag removed?