Talk:Judith McNaught

Untitled
This is the second article I see about a Romance writer with the tag about "notability". I am not the author of this one, either, just a translator into Spanish, because this article is about a writer translated to other languages, which I think is a fact relevant enough to consider interesting this bio. I don't know if it is a problem with references. But they are easily found in many webs about this literature sub-genre. I don't want to think that it has something to do with being a writer read mainly by women. It is not that what makes you doubt about this article's notability, is it?--Joanenglish 02:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I've found at least four today, all marked by the same guy. I know none of them had adequate sourcing, but that is not a reason for a notability tag. I left a message on the guy's sourcepage echoing your comments. Hopefully that will stop the tagging. If you see any others, feel free to let me know and I'll try to improve the sourcing on those articles so we can remove the tags. Karanacs 21:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Judith McNaught. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080924212104/http://www.simonsays.com:80/content/destination.cfm?tab=1 to http://www.simonsays.com/content/destination.cfm?tab=1&pid=361113&agid=13

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Judith McNaught. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000816031031/http://www.likesbooks.com/mcnaught.html to http://www.likesbooks.com/mcnaught.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070418021323/http://www.likesbooks.com/mcnaught2006.html to http://www.likesbooks.com/mcnaught2006.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006064951/http://www.mcnaughtized.com/interview2003eagle.html to http://www.mcnaughtized.com/interview2003eagle.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110704115638/http://209.189.226.235/spotlight/books/texasreads/031603texasreads.htm to http://209.189.226.235/spotlight/books/texasreads/031603texasreads.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101031090753/http://judithmcnaughtforum.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=postlist&Board=1 to http://judithmcnaughtforum.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=postlist&Board=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)