Talk:Judy Carter

Links restored to other pages
I recently restored the page to earlier version and it was switched back. Thats fine, maybe it sounds promotional maybe it does not. Im writing because i made a slight edit restoring the links to her published works. If these works or inappropiate please explain

204.102.74.5 (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * (From the grammar and content of your edits, I am assuming you are Nerdypunkkid editing logged out. If I am wrong, please correct me.) Wikipedia isn't a platform for promotion (WP:NOT), and articles should be written from a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV). The articles about the four books completely failed to meet basic Wikipedia guidelines, so I turned them into redirects. You then restored the articles without fixing any of the serious problems, and then restored this article to it's previous, very poor condition. If you do not understand why the article was promotional, perhaps you should review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines some more: Introduction. Wikipedia uses reliable, WP:SECONDARY sources to establish notability. The idea (on my talk page) that the books need to have their own articles to establish noteworthiness for Judy Carter is just wrong. Wikipedia relies on reliable sources. Grayfell (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2014 (UTC)