Talk:Judy Moody and the Not Bummer Summer

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judy Moody and the Not Bummer Summer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404162133/http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms33.html to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms33.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Questionable claim
"as typical for productions starring female tween characters like the previous year's Ramona and Beezus, as a box office bomb"

This statement is pretty problematic, and I was tempted to just cut it rather than citation-needed bomb it. The claim about the genre needs a citation, obviously, but why keep making these movies if they always bomb. Also, Ramona and Beezus also earned $27.3 million on a $15 million budget, so it's no bomb and I see nothing on a quick google that calls it a bomb, so unless someone can convince me, I'm for cutting this line completely, and adding something simple along the lines of "It bombed." Dhalamh (talk) 22:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)