Talk:Juicy Juice

This is advertising...

Most likely, yes. But that doesn't keep anyone from making more informative entries. As far as I can tell, none of the statements on the page are false, just overzealous. - Quinine 00:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Possible tampering and vandelization
I'm just another anonymous user, but I spotted this on the article "Juicy Juice Cherry tastes like motor oil." 12:00pm, Sunday, 14th of May, 2006


 * You are free to edit that, but I'll do it right now. Rlevse 11:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Direct Copy from Site?
This page appears to be a direct copy from sections of Juicy Juice's home page []. Isn't this a copyright issue? Seems too much to be fair use? Am I wrong? --Benabik 05:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You are absolutely correct, and I've removed the offending material. Now, how on Earth did this page end up on my watchlist? ~CS 05:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Bias
This article seems biased. I just made some changes, but I think it may still need to be cleaned up

75.182.106.197 21:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Something what needs to be mentioned
They may be 100 percent juice, but not the juice you're expecting to get. It's all apple, grape, and pear, because those are cheap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 16:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Right. I added that to the article. Also, I just tasted the cherry, and it tastes like apple - because it is apple. Grundle2600 (talk) 19:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * This information was removed at some point. I'll try to find some sources. Just tasting like apple is not really a source, clearly original research. Fred Talk 21:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The ingredients label should count as a reliable source. Lngt1124 (talk) 23:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The label is a reliable source for what is in the bottle, the copyright date of their logo, the location of the bottling plant, the volume of juice in the bottle, etc. The question is why we would include any of this trivial material. To mention which juices there are more of than which others, we need a reliable secondary source. Otherwise, this is trivial information. If it "should be mentioned", clearly a reliable source will have mentioned this. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:43, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Juicy Juice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100824210118/http://www.foodbev.com/article/nestle-uses-live-tweets-in-ad-campaign to http://www.foodbev.com/article/nestle-uses-live-tweets-in-ad-campaign

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)