Talk:Juju (software)

untitiled
This article about Juju has to have been vandalized. Or it's some kind of joke.

In any event, it seems reasonable to me to say that, objectively, it's incomprehensible.

Best, Scott

--- Must admit that I started it a bit too quickly by doing a simple cut and paste. Hope this update looks better. Nijaba (talk) 14:14, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * While I appreciate the sense of urgency you felt, surely "copy and paste" isn't the way to start a Wikipedia article. I see that you copied directly from juju.ubuntu.com. Please review Plagiarism. It describes various forms of plagiarism on Wikipedia, and even has information about how to include sources under copyleft. – Ringbang (talk) 02:14, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe that the remarks have now been addressed. let me know is that is not the case. Nijaba (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:37, 24 October 2011 (UTC).

This article is just awful and its actually just an advertisement 74.113.166.198 (talk) 14:47, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Rewrite?

 * Information to be added or removed: technical architecture, significant abstractions - notably "relations", distinguishing features
 * Explanation of issue: This article has several flaws. It's basically impossible to discern from the article what Juju is, how it works, or how it is beneficial.
 * References supporting change: (Several, will add to the rewrite if the COI edit proposal receives a proceed)

I have a conflict of interest, but I would be happy to draft a rewrite to address these problems. TimClicks (talk) 20:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I suggest you start slowly. Pick one small portion of the article that could be improved, and post your suggestion with reliable third party references.  See how that goes first and go from there.  GoingBatty (talk) 00:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Makes perfect sense. Thanks for taking the time to respond. TimClicks (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

TODO please add how Canonical makes money with Juju
Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Respectfully, IMO, there is no need for a specific discussion of how Canonical is trying to make money with Juju unless it is unobvious. Since Juju is free and open source software, its developers are likely to be following the same strategy as other developers of free and open source software, including Red Hat and Canonical itself (see Business_models_for_open-source_software). &mdash; HowardBGolden (talk) 21:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)