Talk:Julia Lermontova

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jellybean913. Peer reviewers: Chem2017.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
Suggestions for edits to be made to this page. Sources to consider using include: --Jellybean913 (talk) 01:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * include information about her additions to chemistry, including the named organic reaction which shares her last name.
 * "Women in chemistry: a life devoted to science" Alexander Yu. Rulev* and Mikhail G. Voronkov New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 3826
 * European women in chemistry, 2011
 * Koblitz, A. (1988). Science, Women, and the Russian Intelligentsia: The Generation of the 1860s. Isis, 79(2), 208-226. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/233605

Peer Review
This article is very thorough and well written. One suggestion I have is changing the title Young Life to Early Life. Most wikipedia articles use the title Early LIfe and Education. Additionally, when starting a new sentence I would always reference the persons name. For example under education you began a paragraph by saying " She initially intended to study medicine", I think if you used her name here, especially because it is the start of a new paragraph in a new topic that would be better. Overall great article! Chem2017147.53.105.126 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

This article was very well-rounded with information. The facts regarding her work in the various labs and what she researched while there was very valuable to the grasp of her importance as a chemist and her solid accomplishments. Nice job!

01:46, 1 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makbookpro4 (talk • contribs)

Great job! You found some really interesting research. Your scientist is also very interesting. I think it is crazy that she hasn't been discussed on wikipedia until now, she seem very impressive! (Belles18 (talk) 04:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC))

Wow, this is a really complete article! Excellent use of figures and well done citations.Ebridg01 (talk) 01:46, 2 October 2016 (UTC)