Talk:Julian (Trailer Park Boys character)

Fair use rationale for Image:Julian TPB.jpg
Image:Julian TPB.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Redirection
There's no AFD on this article, and no reason to redirect it. Article reverted, and the vandal hasn't made any attempts to explain this on any of the involved talk pages. Kinsloft (talk) 23:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Once I straighten up the Bubbles article a bit, I'll come over here and clean this one up as well. Kinsloft (talk) 03:20, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Merge
There is no merge proposal. Tag being removed. Kinsloft (talk) 01:44, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Redirection
I see no material here that cannot be adequately covered at the LOC; the notability, fictional, reference, & in-universe concerns remain unaddressed. As we all know, absent a solid foundation of real-world notability, be it as a meme, merchandising, referential or totemic figure, demonstrable real-world cultural significance etc..., individual spinouts are justified in the case of length. This, however, usually trips up against WP:UNDUE. As has been well-established at the talk page of the failed FICT debate, the LOC is a generally agreeable middle path for fictional topics, where the principal focus is the in-universe characterisation of the subject. Since the focus of the three main characters of TPB is (and should remain) their in-universe characterisation, this is therefore best treated at the LOC. As also was generally agreed at the failed WT:FICT, the accumulation of fancruft, unencyclopedic trivia, excessive fictional biographical material and other such content is highly discouraged per the clear terms elaborated at WP:NOT; the use of a centralised LOC for in-universe content offers a practical and manageable mechanism for containing such material. As a result, it seems to me that as no compelling case has been made for the restoration of this material based on a real-world notability of the character, this should be redirected to the LOC. I will post this to the other character pages as well, since it applies equally. Eusebeus (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Lists are not an appropriate way to treat such principal characters. Redirection is not appropriate. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

How much longer do we need to wait for this to be cleaned up by mediation? I would ask this be returned to the LOC (content is duplicate); it can be restored if someone cares to put the work in. Eusebeus (talk) 15:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)