Talk:Juliana Force/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aussie Article Writer (talk · contribs) 00:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)


 * GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * "because of her passion for folk art, this initial display led to the first official public exhibition of folk art in a public showing presentation." Please forgive me, but I am unclear what "presentation" means in this context.
 * ✅ Changed to - Because of her passion for folk art, this initial display led to the first official public exhibition of folk art in a demonstration.
 * Will that work? --Doug Coldwell (talk)
 * Perfect! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Perfect! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)


 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * The following is referenced by a few citations, but when I checked the link, it takes me to an article about Annie Oakley? Are you sure this is the right page? The citation is: W - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I figured out what the situation was. The biography has numerous volumes, the one being linked to was wrong and needed to be changed to Volume 1. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * Earwig shows no issues.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * File:Juliana Force.jpg - tagged correctly, fair use rationale is correctly applied
 * File:NY Studio School 8 W8th cloudy jeh.jpg - CC image
 * File:Whitney Museum of American Art original 0000 door.jpg - PD image
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * File:Juliana Force.jpg - fair use image of the subject
 * File:NY Studio School 8 W8th cloudy jeh.jpg - Whitney Museum of American Art's original building
 * File:Whitney Museum of American Art original 0000 door.jpg - Whitney Museum of American Art's original entrance
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Except for the one referencing issue and a question on one sentence, this is a great nomination for GA! Well done on your hard work. Please clarify the sentence and correct the reference, after which I will check it, if that's good then I am happy to pass. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * excellent, this passes GA! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * File:Juliana Force.jpg - fair use image of the subject
 * File:NY Studio School 8 W8th cloudy jeh.jpg - Whitney Museum of American Art's original building
 * File:Whitney Museum of American Art original 0000 door.jpg - Whitney Museum of American Art's original entrance
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Except for the one referencing issue and a question on one sentence, this is a great nomination for GA! Well done on your hard work. Please clarify the sentence and correct the reference, after which I will check it, if that's good then I am happy to pass. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * excellent, this passes GA! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * excellent, this passes GA! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)