Talk:Juliette (novel)

Untitled
the copyright must have expired. Does anyone know if there's a online version? Xah Lee 23:29, 2004 Dec 29 (UTC)


 * I searched around with Google and I could only find a French version (linked in the article). Project Gutenberg doesn't have the English version either. AxelBoldt 16:31, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The original is obviously in the public domain, but an English translation might not be, depending on when it was made. I have a hard time believing this wasn't translated sometime in the 19th century, but it's possible no transcribers have had access to such an edition yet.Elmo iscariot (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry but the plot summary is aload of crap. It reads like a critical book review. For instance "similar philosophical rants during the book, all attacking the ideas of God, morals, remorse, love" i'm sorry but unless a NPOV is somewhere between the bible belt this is certianly biased. Note also the use of 'manages to murder her way through a huge number of people, including various family members and friends' which sounds like a slice of a review from Oprah Winfrey and not an encyclopedia entry. Can someone please sort this out?82.195.110.34
 * Well, there's no better time than now, there's no better person than you :-) AxelBoldt 05:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

public domain translation
This book needs a public domain English translation, even if it's not "professional". I can't seem to find even a random full text source of this in English (on the web)--it's all Justine this and Justine that. Anyone good in French and English up for it? =) Quillaja (talk) 07:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

prequel
I disagree that Justine was a prequel to Juliette, since Justine was both written and published first (according to their Wikipedia entries) Dick Kimball (talk) 18:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC) --K10wnsta (talk) 01:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * lolwut? I disagree that a valid definition for redundant would be ' see redundant ' because it would make you do the same thing over and over again.
 * I don't know what your problem was with his pointing out the obvious error in this article seven years ago but he was right. In any case the action in the two novels is simultaneous. Neither is a sequel nor a prequel to the other.ZarhanFastfire (talk) 01:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)