Talk:Julius Chingono

Untitled
Peer Review by User:Okinawalover

Your lead is fairly short, I would add a little bit more information. Make sure the info you add is concise and overly detailed.
 * Lead

You have very few sources. I would suggest looking through AUM library and check Jstor for some articles and journals if you have not already.
 * Sourcing

Your article is structured very well. I would suggest adding death to the bibliography section.
 * Structure

* Language Overall, the language used was good and easy to read. The publication and appearances section was a little difficult to read. Also, for the collaborations section, I would suggest listing the poems and stories he wrote. Okinawalover (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review by User:Nickywithdablicky

Your lead is pretty short. I would try adding a few details to create a concise summary for the article.
 * Lead

You only have one reference, I recommend gathering some peer review articles, journals, or looking on Jstor.
 * Sourcing

Your article is structured very well by adding each sub-heading.
 * Structure

The language was well chosen and easy to understand. In the Publication and Appearances section, you could remove most of those commas.This would eliminate most of the run-on sentences and make it easier to comprehend. Nickywithdablicky (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Language

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 5 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Quarantineditor.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
by User: Aumgirl2024

Aumgirl2024 (talk) 07:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Lead
 * The lead is short but tells about the topic. You could add more information about him like what he's known for.
 * Sourcing
 * I think you should add more reliable sources. The first source that you have doesn't seem to be that reliable, as it is a books collective with no sources cited about where the information comes from. The second source you have seems to be the same. There isn't a cited section and there is no "About Us" section. I also think that you should add references behind more sentences in the article. You could look through google books to see if you are able to find more about your topic.
 * Structure
 * Overall, I think your structure is pretty good. The article is neatly organized with the sections you included.
 * Language
 * Overall, I think that the language is good. There are some minor grammatical errors in the "Collaborations" section, like "is" instead of "his", and the period at the end of the sentence.

english
essa6 about my old shoe by Julius Chingono 41.169.97.195 (talk) 19:47, 13 August 2023 (UTC)