Talk:July Ordinances

Revert
I have reverted the rather curious edits by 67.86.112.244. I do not understand the purpose or intention of the edits, but they left the article in an even worse state than it was in before --Constantine Evans 01:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

I'd like to dispute this article's neutrality...
It almost seems to be justifying Charles X's actions every step of the way.

"Compelled by what he felt to be a growing, manipulative radicalism in the elected government, Charles felt that as king by right of birth and not parliamentary privilege, his primary duty was the guarantee of order and happiness in France and its people; not in political bipartisanship and the self-interpreted rights of implacable political enemies."

There are clearly strong signs of bias here, and far too much support on the part of Charles X's actions.