Talk:Jumiles

Untitled
Does anyone have an idea what species jumiles are?Tubezone 07:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * According to Ramos-Elorduy and Pino, "'jumiles' (stink bugs) means virtually any edible Hemiptera from the families Pentatomidae and Coreidae, and the number of species grows to 23, with the State of Guerrero having 18 species, but all species are eaten the same way. DeFoliart also says jumiles are hemipterans of the genera Atizies, Edessa and Euchistus. Euschistus zopilotensis and Atizies taxcoensis ("jumiles de Taxco") are specifically mentioned.  Gobōnobo  + c 05:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Taste
On the show "Bizarre Foods" on the Travel Channel (USA) the host describes the taste as "exactly like tutti-fruity bubble gum", that seems to contradict the taste describe in the article. Anyone who has consumed one care to edit the article if it is inaccurate?

66.159.220.110 05:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

I ate one today, it definitely tastes like cinnamon. I deleted the talk about "Bizarre Foods" because it does not add to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.225.209.9 (talk) 03:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jumiles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.food-insects.com/book7_31/Chapter%2003%20MEXICO.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150423113342/http://www.food-insects.com/Insects%20as%20Human%20Food.htm to http://www.food-insects.com/Insects%20as%20Human%20Food.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

actual name of "Atizies taxcoensis" is unknown
The actual name of this species is unknown; no one even knows what genus it belongs to. The original description from 1932 had no illustrations, and no one has found a type specimen. A document in 2013 stated that the species is of completely unknown status but might belong to the genus Edessa, which is consistent with the recognition of Edessa mexicana as the species called "chumil". It seems unlikely that its identity will ever be resolved, so it should be removed from this article to keep it from being propagated. Dyanega (talk) 23:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)