Talk:Jump (magazine line)

Huh??
How is this article any separate/different from Weekly Shonen Jump? -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 00:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * This is all the Jump magazines, not Weekly Shōnen Jump. You told me to try to merge this with Shueisha before, I tried, didn't work. But now, let me guess, you want me to merge this with Weekly Jump? : ( —  J U M P G U R U   ■ ask ㋐㋜㋗ ■ 00:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * No...the way it was, it looked like a repeat of WSJ. It should still be merged to Shueisha, as prose, not a series of tables (you seem to be getting a little addicted to tables :-p ) -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 01:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Taaabllllless! *_* —  J U M P G U R U   ■ ask ㋐㋜㋗ ■ 01:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Redirect
Shoud we redirect this to Shueisha? —  J U M P G U R U   ■ ask ㋐㋜㋗ ■ 01:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No the article is notable and good enough to be on itself.Helpspoke (talk) 13:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)