Talk:Jumping to conclusions

I'm no editor, so, just wondering if the following section == Information == Jumping to tae is a form of [cognitive distortion]

"Jumping to tae" - shouldn't this be "Jumping to conclusions" ? Thanks 92.19.105.185 (talk) 13:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jumping to conclusions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116135345/http://daphne.palomar.edu/jtagg/jump.htm to http://daphne.palomar.edu/jtagg/jump.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Phantom Tollbooth in "see also" despite no immediately apparent connection
I find it odd that the article for The Phantom Tollbooth is put in the "see also" section without a clear connection to the article. I have read the book, and know that one part of the book involves literally jumping to conclusions. However, someone who doesn't know that would be confused as to why it is in the see also section. I feel like it would be better to actually mention that book in the article, probably in the Comedy section. NicolinoChess31415926 (talk) 23:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)