Talk:Junaid Hafeez

Tone it down
This article has a tone more suggestive of an op-ed piece than an encyclopedic article. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

What is the allegedly blasphemous thing he said?
That might be important to add to the article. FriendlyContributions (talk) 00:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

It seems like this article is completely one sided, and even worse it is openly one sided. There is no detail on actual prosecution evidence, which the authors have "intentionally" disregarded. Every citation is from Western media and organization, which are almost always biased towards any distinct Islamic laws that is implemented. For Wikipedia to publish such one sided article/biography only reaffirms its position as the "Western Propaganda Agent", yet claims to be an Encyclopedia. An Encyclopedia is not biased. I think it would be more productive for Wikipedia to stick with the Sciences, and skip record of events that produce extreme bias from politically/emotionally driven actors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.179.243 (talk) 04:29, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

It Is Known That He Was Falsely Accused and Convicted
After Junaid was in custody, the “blasphemous” comments continued to be posted on his Facebook. For more than a day. He had zero access to Facebook while in jail. His first lawyer (who was murdered for representing him) provided proof of that. Moreover, it’s known that this group threatened him extensively with death just prior to this. And, while this last part is anecdotal, I can tell you Junaid was devout and respectful, never blasphemous so that would have been out of character. Which doesn’t matter because there was proof that the posts didn’t actually come from Junaid. 2601:601:1001:AD40:A00C:7C4C:99C6:79E1 (talk) 19:12, 27 August 2022 (UTC)