Talk:Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2021/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 19:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this tonight. -- Zanimum (talk) 19:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Okay, I've been making edits as I go, for small readability changes. Things like sentence length, past/present tense, etc.


 * Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: "The event is held as it was in 2019 (scenario A)." Was there something special that happened in 2019, or does this just mean that it would be held as normal, and the last normal year was 2019?
 * Postcards: I've used Eurovision Song Contest 2021 as a source for the rewording, as it's not immediately obvious as a reader outside of Eurovision's core audience.
 * Spokespersons: Perhaps "12 points from the juries" would benefit from a link to Kids Jury in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest?

In general, I find it quite odd that they provide "estimated" vote tallies, when it's tracked by computers.

I'll review other things like sources soon; the one that jumps out at me is that Azerbaijan is lacking a source in Broadcasts.

Generally good so far, ! -- Zanimum (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't think a link to Kids Jury in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest would be necessary as there were only adult juries this year. Tai123.123 (talk) 01:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for starting the review! I've reworded the scenario A thing a bit. There was indeed no separate kids jury this year but two of five jury members for each country were kids; I'm not sure how to incorporate that into the prose though. Regarding the source for Azerbaijan: that İTV broadcast it is already covered by the source in the table header, and since I couldn't find anything about their commentator there wasn't anything extra that needed to be sourced. Or should I list the source in the header there too? &horbar;Jochem van Hees (talk) 09:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

there's no rush of course, I'm just curious what the status is of the review, since it's been over a week? If you don't have time now then I understand. &horbar;Jochem van Hees (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Jochem van Hees Can I ping him again because its been a while since your last ping Tai123.123 (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah let's do another ping @. Otherwise we can just reset nomination and get a different review (WP:GAN/I) &horbar;Jochem van Hees (talk) 20:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)