Talk:Junkers Ju 252

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Junkers Ju 252. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/hjunkers/ju_who_e.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Junkers Ju 252. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608021748/http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com/cgi-bin/res.pl?keyword=Junkers+Ju+252&offset=0 to http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com/cgi-bin/res.pl?keyword=Junkers+Ju+252&offset=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Variants section
I recently added a variants section to this article, in which I put the Ju 352 and Ju 452 as developments, which is in line with the manual of style for aircraft articles. Two hours later, Denniss reverted my edit without an explanation. Perhaps we should discuss this here to avoid any misunderstandings. - ZLEA T\C 02:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 352 not a variant + also listed in infobox/See also section. Ju 452 was a paper project at best. --Denniss (talk) 12:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Many articles on WWII German aircraft, including Dornier Do 335, Messerschmitt Me 262, Messerschmitt Bf 109 variants, and Heinkel He 219, list developments, some of them paper projects, with the main variants. If not the 352, would you be opposed to listing the 452 in the variants section like so many other articles? - ZLEA T\<b style="color:#6B8E23">C</b> 13:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Paper projects, regardless of how far they got are deemed sufficiently notable for inclusion, and if there was more than one variant, there should be a variants section. As for the 352, developments are often included in variants, and that was what the 352 was. It would be remiss for either of these to not be included.&#32;- NiD.29 (talk) 23:14, 30 May 2020 (UTC)