Talk:Junko Sakurada/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: Three found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Reasonably well written, complies with key elements of MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Well referenced, sources appear to be RS, assume good faith for off-line sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I believe that this is sufficiently detailed and focussed, especially in the light of here withdrawal from public view.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images used.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I believe that the article meets the GA criteria, so I am happy to list it. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)