Talk:Jurisprudence of interests

Rewrite
This article is a translation from the Portuguese Wikipedia, originally not a very skillful one. (I suspect heavy reliance on Dr. Google.) I have tried to improve the English idiom, but my Portuguese is poor and my knowledge of the topic is worse, so we need somebody with better knowledge to rewrite it. In particular, I couldn't make much sense of the last paragraph, either in the Portuguese original or as it stood in English, so my revision is more-or-less a guess at what it might be intended to convey. J. D. Crutchfield &#124; Talk 18:09, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


 * It is not particularly difficult, I recommend Helmut Coing as a source: European Private Law 1800–1914, Munich 1989. § 7 V, pp. 51–53. Short and concise. Jurisprudence of interests followed the Jurisprudence of concepts, which tried to define law through the mere abstraction of concepts and did not want to give the judge any discretion. The Jurisprudence of interests was more flexible, because the judge was granted the right to pursue further legal training in any case if there is a loophole in the law (analogy). mg Stephan Klage (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * This note is not negligible either: Jurisprudence of interests is based on the ethics of Jeremy Benthams and Rudolf von Jherings (Helmut Coing:  Philosophy of Law , pp. 136, 48 f.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephan Klage (talk • contribs) 21:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)