Talk:Jury Duty (2023 TV series)

Reception
There is a 98% audience approval on Rotten Tomatoes. That should be recognised. 220.233.199.209 (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Read the article. It's 73%, not 98%. Sundayclose (talk) 15:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

The plot of the film “the Truman Show” seemed unethical, but at least all the actors in the film were in on the joke. This article does not explain how this was done on the show to address such similar ethical or legal concerns, and how people feel about that aspect of the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:4300:EE90:1C40:CD84:9FD:386 (talk) 01:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The logical conclusion is that, just like in the Truman show, this "reality" show was also a work of fiction. So no ethical/legal concerns either. 179.68.121.195 (talk) 02:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

The article for Gladden on Wikipedia explains how this occurred, it doesn’t get into the ethics. Possibly, giving him a long term contract was to get him to agree a la Candid Camera, to accept this, after the fact, but it doesn’t say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:4300:EE90:1C40:CD84:9FD:386 (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Regardless of him accepting this after the fact, it would still be a crime to purposefully convince someone was taking part in what was a fake legal proceeding, lead by a fake judge, regardless if Ronald accepted it or not. That would cover only civil litigation. It would still be a misdemeanor, with up to 1 year in jail as punishment. 179.68.121.195 (talk) 02:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * conspiracy can constitute a felony even if the underlying crime is a misdemeanor. 98.169.219.45 (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC)