Talk:Just Dance 2023 Edition/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Maplestrip (talk · contribs) 13:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Article's lead section contains original information that is not expanded upon in the prose of the article (i.e. Stadia), "Gameplay" section is written from the perspective of someone familiar with the franchise (what are "dancer cards"?) and contains plot information, lists are probably too extensive, instead of a Development section we have a "Future" section at the end which won't hold up, Reception section is empty.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * Gameplay section is largely uncited.
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * Extensive use of primary Twitter sources and "Ubisoft News". (Q&A interview link seems broken too?)
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Not impressively so, for what it's worth.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Quick fail. I hope you will continue to work on this article. In particular, I recommend expanding the Reception section with text from the reviews listed on Metacritic. I also recommend rewriting the Gameplay/Plot sections from the perspective of someone unfamiliar with the franchise. Lastly, I will say that footnotes like "Free from 27 February to 9 March" are completely pointless on Wikipedia. We are not a listing for good deals. Best of luck, I'm sorry I couldn't be more positive on this one!
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Not impressively so, for what it's worth.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Quick fail. I hope you will continue to work on this article. In particular, I recommend expanding the Reception section with text from the reviews listed on Metacritic. I also recommend rewriting the Gameplay/Plot sections from the perspective of someone unfamiliar with the franchise. Lastly, I will say that footnotes like "Free from 27 February to 9 March" are completely pointless on Wikipedia. We are not a listing for good deals. Best of luck, I'm sorry I couldn't be more positive on this one!
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Not impressively so, for what it's worth.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Quick fail. I hope you will continue to work on this article. In particular, I recommend expanding the Reception section with text from the reviews listed on Metacritic. I also recommend rewriting the Gameplay/Plot sections from the perspective of someone unfamiliar with the franchise. Lastly, I will say that footnotes like "Free from 27 February to 9 March" are completely pointless on Wikipedia. We are not a listing for good deals. Best of luck, I'm sorry I couldn't be more positive on this one!
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Quick fail. I hope you will continue to work on this article. In particular, I recommend expanding the Reception section with text from the reviews listed on Metacritic. I also recommend rewriting the Gameplay/Plot sections from the perspective of someone unfamiliar with the franchise. Lastly, I will say that footnotes like "Free from 27 February to 9 March" are completely pointless on Wikipedia. We are not a listing for good deals. Best of luck, I'm sorry I couldn't be more positive on this one!
 * Quick fail. I hope you will continue to work on this article. In particular, I recommend expanding the Reception section with text from the reviews listed on Metacritic. I also recommend rewriting the Gameplay/Plot sections from the perspective of someone unfamiliar with the franchise. Lastly, I will say that footnotes like "Free from 27 February to 9 March" are completely pointless on Wikipedia. We are not a listing for good deals. Best of luck, I'm sorry I couldn't be more positive on this one!