Talk:Just Mercy (book)

Start class
Did you mean to label this article as start class? If so, could you provide reasons for doing so? It is highly unusual to rate an article with 14 kB of prose and over 70 references as start class. I meant to do a lot more expanding, but ran out of time to nominate it for DYK. I usually don't edit the articles while waiting on DYK, but I will make an exception to try to fix whatever problems caused it to be labeled as start class. Footlessmouse (talk) 23:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I've just seen this comment now and re-rated it B-class—I remember checking some of the B-class criteria at the time of the DYK review and I don't know why I didn't make the change. My main suggestion would be that "Reception" could be populated with more informative and analytic quotes (e.g. more of "praised the research", "said that the book was accessible to the target audience except in the details of X" and less of "it was amazing", "found it fantastic"). I was a bit surprised on initial reading about the layout and the length of the "Publication history" edition listings, but that's not to say that it's wrong—I think it does deviate a bit from WP:NONFICTION's suggested ordering and wonder whether a collapsible box would be appropriate for the listings, but these are just suggestions. — Bilorv ( talk ) 17:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)