Talk:Just another Gibbs sampler

Notable?
Certainly notable if OpenBugs is notable Jagsuser (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * That is no argument. If you feel OpenBugs is notable or not, discuss that on the OpenBugs page. Personally I'd say this looks like a nice tool but it will not meet notability guidelines unless it becomes more widely used to the point that it is discussed in reliable third-party publications. If that has happened then please add citations to the article. --mcld (talk) 12:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I added some sentences and migth write more in the future, as I it is a very important program for my work! --92.72.213.6 (talk) 12:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Just another Gibbs sampler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120915083751/http://w3.jouy.inra.fr/unites/miaj/public/matrisq/Contacts/applibugs.bugs_project.evolution.pdf to http://w3.jouy.inra.fr/unites/miaj/public/matrisq/Contacts/applibugs.bugs_project.evolution.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)