Talk:Just war theory

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Blim1711, Arapisar33. Peer reviewers: Bdevalk, Hunter Santana.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Just war theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=AugCity.xml&images=images%2Fmodeng&data=%2Ftexts%2Fenglish%2Fmodeng%2Fparsed&tag=public&part=all
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=AugCity.xml&images=images%2Fmodeng&data=%2Ftexts%2Fenglish%2Fmodeng%2Fparsed&tag=public&part=all
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017000253/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2065/is_n2_v48/ai_18310385/print?tag=artBody%3Bcol1 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2065/is_n2_v48/ai_18310385/print?tag=artBody%3Bcol1
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928075431/http://www.the-tidings.com/2006/0825/benson.htm to http://www.the-tidings.com/2006/0825/benson.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214041110/http://www.democratiya.com/review.asp?reviews_id=124 to http://www.democratiya.com/review.asp?reviews_id=124

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Just war theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090509230737/http://www.eppc.org/publications/pubID.1998/pub_detail.asp to http://www.eppc.org/publications/pubID.1998/pub_detail.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Just war theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.britannica.com/2010/03/william-james-on-peace-and-war/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160416133521/http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/intrel/people/index.php/njr3.html to https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/intrel/people/index.php/njr3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Person box misplaced
Removed -Inowen (nlfte) 23:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, Globalization does involve just war theory
Even the globalization notes how it involves war. The absence of the words "just war theory" is a poor excuse to corrupt how globalization relates to war and thus the just war theoryJoeScarce (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Source what you mentioned does not say about just war, does not mention unjust war, no denouncing, not mentioning official position of church. This is just war theory article. Content is about that. You made a lot of personal conclusion on different articles and many of that isnt mentioned in that pope interview. It is just your personal conclusion. Wikipedia is not about personal conclusions and activism it is about facts. 93.86.91.234 (talk) 21:26, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your personal conclusion is very ridiculous.JoeScarce (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * seems you dont get what theory is and what theory definition take and what content is. Advocacy or pov opinions, you should leave to own blog or twitter or something, not to wikipedia. Pushing own views can take you just to be blocked. 93.86.91.234 (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Seems like your opinion is only laughable to me. Others seem to revert the bias deletions you made to some of my other edits on other articles as well. Let's work as team and follow the NPOV policyJoeScarce (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You cherrypicked stuff and made own conclusion and you cant make any argument at all.93.86.91.234 (talk) 21:50, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

No, you can't make an argument at all and are making me laugh. It's the reason why you went to talk to someone with a Che Guevara poster, which also shows bias in me potentially getting blocked.JoeScarce (talk) 21:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * sorry but you dont play fair and you use wikipedia as promotional tool. I dont know what your motives are but it is just strange and funny.93.86.91.234 (talk) 21:57, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

There is no correlation. So, no need to add that to this article Banovicmiki14 (talk) 01:42, 13 August 2019 (UTC) - The page was protected randomly on the version in which I found it at. Please don't cast aspersions. Stick to the material with the aim of demonstrating that your edit does not, in fact, constitute original research or synthesis. Which may well be the case. Avoid personal comments, at any case. Thanks. El_C 21:59, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Ancient Egypt
The paragraph on Egypt doesn't make sense. The point of the just war theory is to establish the absolute limits to availability of war for any politician. The paragraph basically describes that Egyptians were so imperialist (to use the modern terminology) and jingoistic, that basically any conquest of the surrounding nations was justified as “white man’s burden” of the Ancient times, i.e., that there were basically no limits, even theoretical ones, for Egyptian pharao to conduct a war at will. Ceplm (talk) 21:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Other branches of Christianity
The part talking about Christian talks about Catholic Christianity and only adds the Russian Orthodox Church as a subsection. The views written in the section are not universal among Christians. The New Testament and pacifism is not linked at all in this page which it should be in the section of Christianity. 93.109.80.5 (talk) 16:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Christian pacifism has its own article, but you should note that pacifist groups like the Anabaptists and the Christadelphians have had a rather minor impact on military history. Dimadick (talk) 08:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)