Talk:Justin Lee (activist)

Justin W. Lee
The "W" seems to come from, where there's a W. As that's the only reference, and since Justin Lee seems to have been deleted? I'd say let's move this one over. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 01:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I saw the Wake Forest reference, but wondered if it was taken from the Wikipedia list of WFU alumni... All the other Google results for "Justin W Lee" were quotes from this site.... I'd vote to move it too... Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Photo?
We need a photo for this article. What are the requirements for photos in a BLP article? Proboscis monkey (talk) 21:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

What article? Aaron Saltzer (talk) 07:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

James White debate
I see my edit was reverted because I didn't give a source. I couldn't give my source, because the source I was using was (and is) blacklisted. Turns out the debate is also on youtube, however, so I put the edit back in. If I didn't do this correctly, please don't just revert my edit again; please help me to know how to fix it. Fool4jesus (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * And you reinserted it based n a YouTube upload, which is neither reliable nor secondary. Please see WP:RS. Guy (Help!) 23:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * OK. I guess I'm trying to figure out where to go with this. The fact that Lee and White participated in a debate on the exact subject that Lee bases his life's work on seems notable to me. I attempted to put a reference to sermon audio, which you blocked, despite the fact that the publisher is notable (James White is a well-known Christian apologist who has put in years of study, published a book, and done four public moderated debates on this topic). As to it being secondary, many of the sources listed on this page itself are from Justin Lee's organization, which at least appears to me to be no more secondary than White's organization. I am having a hard time understanding why, except for reasons of unpopular content, those other sources are reliable and secondary, while mine is not. I am not trying to be difficult here. It seems to me that a debate on the very topic of this man's work is of value to anybody who honestly wants to understand the issues involved. Fool4jesus (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * How about: forget it? Guy (Help!) 01:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)