Talk:Justin Lee sex scandal

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://shanghaiist.com/2013/01/10/justin_lee_sex_scandal_the_backgrou.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Justin Lee (criminal). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130905225721/http://www.channelnewsasia.com:80/news/entertainment/22-years-jail-for-sexual/800446.html to http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/entertainment/22-years-jail-for-sexual/800446.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130907210023/http://www.straitstimes.com:80/the-big-story/asia-report/taiwan/story/taiwan-playboy-justin-lee-sentenced-22-years-4-months-raping- to http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/asia-report/taiwan/story/taiwan-playboy-justin-lee-sentenced-22-years-4-months-raping-

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Paine  u/ c  20:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 10 October 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. We have a rough consensus here to rename this page away from the "(criminal)" disambiguator to a more natural title about the crime. While other possible names were mentioned, I don't see consensus nor reason to vary from the proposer's title. A hatnote will be put in place to address other concerns here. (non-admin closure)  Paine   u/ c  18:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Justin Lee (criminal) → Justin Lee sex scandal – As discussed in the AFD (See Articles for deletion/Justin Lee (criminal)), I propose renaming the title. The event is significant here and this article largely talks about the event. Also the use of the word "criminal" is a bit odd to say the least. A title about the event is factual and resolves any BLP concerns. Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC) --Relisting.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 04:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment See and  which use the term "sex scandal" to describe this. I am open to other suggestions as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Choice of wording could be made a bit formal. Such as Justin Lee sexual assault scandal --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess I will ping the AfD participants. Sending pings --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Add  --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment a little bit concerned that a move to title like that could easily lead people to misread Justin Lee (actor) etc. was the same person. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm, would a hatnote help here? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose for now. It's not evident from the article yet, but looking at the sources, it appears Lee was notable before the rape cases, meaning it's better suited as a bio article.--Cúchullain t/ c 14:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose at this time because of the presence of Justin Lee (actor); these could easily be confused if the article under discussion is renamed, which could be considered a BLP issue. "Criminal" vs "actor" disambiguates them quite well. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose as the subject matter and party needs to be clear, as In ictu oculi & K.e.coffman both state. Kierzek (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Move to "Justin Lee sex assault scandal". To quote my comment on the AfD: Keep, move and repurpose as "Justin Lee sexual assault scandal" or similar, to conform with the equivalent article on Chinese Wikipedia. This is a case of WP:BLP1E where the 1E was highly notable. We shouldn't worry about confusion with other Justin Lees because the article content makes it clear that they're two different people. Deryck C. 17:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Support a move to Justin Lee sex assault scandal or nomination per WP:BLP1E. Even the Chinese Wikipedia article with far more content is not a biography.  —  AjaxSmack   23:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Rename to make the article about the sex scandal. Lee was not notable before this broke. He was a partier of no note. We would not at all consider the article but for his alleged crimes. This Lee is one of 5 mentioned when you search Justin Lee, there is no reason to think the rename would be taken as an attack on the actor, as opposed to the activist or any of the others. If Justin Lee was not a disambiguation page the above concerns might have weight, but it is a disambiguation page so they do not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Support Should have no confusion as long as we have a link above pointing out this is not about the actor and point them to the actor and disambiguous page at the top. Zhanzhao (talk) 11:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.