Talk:Justin Roczniak

Requested move 28 February 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure)  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   18:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Donoteat01 → Justin Roczniak – It's his real name, and it's what he goes by here: as well as on his podcast, which he is equally well known for. No reason to call the article donoteat01, when he is known for things outside of the YouTube channel. Freedom4U (talk) 03:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * https://www.npr.org/2022/10/12/1128312587/examining-the-issues-behind-a-possible-rail-strike
 * https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/09/opinion/business-economics/freight-train-mismanagement.html


 * Strong support per nom. ---   Tbf69   P &bull;&#32;T 16:06, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support It seems most Youtubers go by their real name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

BRD
I was directing you towards the talk page in the spirit of WP:Bold, Revert, Discuss and I kindly request that you self-revert while we discuss this. I removed your addition of his New York Times op-ed because Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and there's no coverage of his NYTimes op-ed in any secondary sources (I looked it up months ago too and couldn't find any then either). : 3 F4U (they/it) 18:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Forgot to ping, sorry! @Bart Terpstra : 3 F4U (they/it) 18:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll add on that we don't do indiscriminate lists of all books an author has written or all the news articles a journalist has written either. We add books if other people have reviewed them and we add op-eds and news articles if it can be shown that the article/op-ed itself has had an outsized impact or if its been noted in secondary sources. : 3 F4U (they/it) 19:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * They haven't written 20 books or even 2 articles.
 * As far as i know this is there only writing in a major publication.
 * Therefore it's not indiscriminate and it fits within a wider pattern of advocating for different urban patterns and public transportation. It is a flaw in the structure of the article, rather than the inclusion of the source or the sentence. Bart Terpstra (talk) 20:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Bart Terpstra Unless it can be shown that there is some sort of bigger relevance, as it is stated in the link I provided To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources. : 3 F4U (they/it) 20:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The new york times is independent from the author. Bart Terpstra (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * ? I'm not quite sure what you mean. The New York Times op-ed is a primary source (meaning it is not independent from the op-ed/Roczniak) because it is the op-ed in question. : 3 F4U (they/it) 20:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)