Talk:Justus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nice and short, just the way I like 'em. ;-)


 * Can you clarify this for me: "He was regarded as a saint after his death ...". Seems a bit vague. Was he actually canonized, or was it just that some people thought of him as a saint?
 * He's "pre-process" as a saint. He was never formally canonized, and I don't show any sign that he was ever "approved" later like Peter of Canterbury was. He's considered a saint because he's listed on calendars of saints. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * "In the 1090s, his remains were translated to a shrine ...". Could that be changed to something more obvious like "moved" without any loss of meaning?
 * Done. Linked to Translation (relics) as well as a quick


 * "When a pagan reaction against Christianity broke out after the death of Æthelberht ...". I'm not sure that "reactions" can break out. What form did this reaction take?
 * The bishops of Rochester and London were driven out from their sees, and ran to Gaul for safety. Justus managed to return to Rochester later, Mellitus never did make it back to London. I've tried "developed"


 * I think I'd be happier if the lead began simply with "Justus" rather that "Saint Justus", as he wasn't a saint while he was Archbishop of Canterbury.
 * I would be too. I thought I got all the "Saint Justus" from the article, I guess I missed one. Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The prose needs tightening in a few places. Do you know a good copyeditor who might be able to help?
 * Gee. I don't know. Good copyeditors are worth their weight in gold, do you have a recommendation? Ealdgyth - Talk 19:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

That's it, nothing much to be concerned about there, so I'm putting this article on hold. --Malleus Fatuorum 12:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm happy with the article now, so I'm listing it as a GA. --Malleus Fatuorum 21:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)