Talk:K-140 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 22:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

I would love to review this article. – TC N7  JM  22:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Lead Route description
 * "rural land between Ellsworth, Kansas and Salina, Kansas." You mentioned in the previous sentence that the highway was in Kansas, so adding the state after either city is redundant.
 * . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * There are three instances in the first paragraph in which the citations are not in numeric order.
 * . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * "Just after passing through Carneiro K-140..." This would read better with a comma.
 * ❌ I would say yes if it were like that, but when you take the sentence as a whole it sounds worse with the comma to my ears. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 00:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * "After traveling 1.001 miles (1.611 km) through the city of Brookville..." This seems too precise. Saying it's approximately one mile using convert/spell will suffice.
 * . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Refs. 1 and 2 seem to be a bit over-cited. You do not need a Google Maps citation after every sentence. One at the end of the paragraph is fine.
 * ❌ I cite after each sentence in which a source is used because I do not use the sources universally throughout paragraphs. I use ref 1 for some sentences, ref 2 for some sentences, and both for some sentences. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * "Rural farmland" is redundant.
 * . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * First sentence in the final paragraph seems like a WP:OVERLINK violation. I don't think either pavement or concrete needs to be linked.
 * . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The preciseness in the traffic info...just...seems way too technical. Is it necessary for you to have high/lows for every single piece of the highway with measurements down to the hundredth of a mile? It seems like overkill.
 * . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

History
 * More numerical order errors...
 * . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * "was established in the 1926..." And we live in the 2013. :p
 * . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 23:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * There's nothing concerning pavement. This road was first designated in 1926, so there probably wasn't yet a standard for paving U.S. Routes.
 * . I added what I could...if there's any more history that could be added it's buried deep in microfilm archives of The Salina Journal. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 00:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Again, you should probably throw Ref. 6 out the window. It's likely a SPS.
 * ✅, let me know if the new one is acceptable instead. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 00:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me. – TC N7  JM  00:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Major intersections
 * No outstanding errors.

References
 * No problems with dead links, verifiability, or plagiarism, now that the SPS is gone. – TC N7  JM  00:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Final verdict
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Inappropriate due to lack to images
 * 1) Overall: My concerns have been addressed. I feel this meets the Good Article criteria.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Inappropriate due to lack to images
 * 1) Overall: My concerns have been addressed. I feel this meets the Good Article criteria.
 * Pass/Fail:

Date: 07/19/2012                   2012 Distress State, Performance Level and Distress Data Listing                      Page:1 ( Location References are in English units and Pavement Condition Measurements are in English units. ) <-PMS Seg.ID.No.--> LogPoint    Dis P Pr    Pv            Prof ROUGHNESS Surv    <- FLEXIBLE DISTRESS -> <- RIGID DISTRESS-> Co.  Beg. End   St  L FY RC Ty  AADT EAL  Date iriL iriR Date Rt Fc1 Fc2 Fc3 Fc4 T0 T1 T2 T3 Bc  F F1 F2 F3 J1J2J3J4 ---| in/mi  |---|lin.ft{wp}/100f|-|    %   |--- 0.406 ECL ELLSWORTH    001 - 0.580 027(K140-0)0001(0) 0.406-1.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   781 94   5/16   93  100 4/03  _   _  19   _   _  _  _ 57  _  _  *  *  *  * * * * * 0.495 K140/K156        001 - 0.491 027(K140-0)0102(0) 1.000-2.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   730 100  5/16   77   81 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _  _ 70 03  _ 027(K140-0)0203(0) 2.000-3.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   730 100  5/16   79   78 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _  _ 77  _  _ 027(K140-0)0304(0) 3.000-4.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   730 100  5/16   80   76 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 02 65  _  _ 027(K140-0)0405(0) 4.000-5.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   745 98   5/16   71   77 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _  _ 63  _  _ 4.014 K111/K140        004 + 0.065 027(K140-0)0506(0) 5.000-6.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   631 96   5/16   65   68 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _  _ 40  _  _ 5.264 RS1002           005 + 0.264 027(K140-0)0607(0) 6.000-7.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   590 95   5/16   68   70 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 03 38  _  _ 027(K140-0)0708(0) 7.000-8.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   590 95   5/16   68   68 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _  _ 50  _  _ 027(K140-0)0809(0) 8.000-9.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   590 95   5/16   70   70 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 02 35  _  _ 027(K140-0)0910(0) 9.000-10.000 131 2  _ 10 CO   590 95   5/16   67   67 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 02 30 03  _ 027(K140-0)1011(0) 10.000-11.000 131 2 _ 10 CO   590 95   5/16   71   77 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _  _ 47 03  _ 11.000 RS1751           011 + 0.059 027(K140-0)1112(0) 11.000-12.000 131 2 _  9 CO   650 86   5/16   68   73 4/03  _   _  83   _   _  _  _ 48  _  _ 027(K140-0)1213(0) 12.000-13.000 131 2 _  9 CO   650 86   5/16   78   68 4/03 01   _   _   _   _  _  _ 48  _  _ 027(K140-0)1314(0) 13.000-14.000 131 2 _  9 CO   650 87   5/16   69   72 4/03 01   _  25   _   _  _  _ 45  _  _ 13.931 K140/K141        014 - 0.098 027(K140-0)1415(0) 14.000-15.000 131 2 _ 10 CO   815 92   5/16   67   79 4/03 01   _  25   _   _  _  _ 55  _  _ 027(K140-0)1516(0) 15.000-16.445 131 2 _ 10 CO   940 96   5/16   72   88 4/03 01   _   _   _   _  _ 02 30  _  _ 16.445 E CO L           016 + 0.334

Date: 07/19/2012                   2012 Distress State, Performance Level and Distress Data Listing                      Page:1 ( Location References are in English units and Pavement Condition Measurements are in English units. ) <-PMS Seg.ID.No.--> LogPoint    Dis P Pr    Pv            Prof ROUGHNESS Surv    <- FLEXIBLE DISTRESS -> <- RIGID DISTRESS-> Co.  Beg. End   St  L FY RC Ty  AADT EAL  Date iriL iriR Date Rt Fc1 Fc2 Fc3 Fc4 T0 T1 T2 T3 Bc  F F1 F2 F3 J1J2J3J4 ---| in/mi  |---|lin.ft{wp}/100f|-|    %   |--- 0.000 W CO L           017 - 0.646 085(K140-0)0001(0) 0.000-1.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   940 97   5/16   60   62 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _  _ 45  _  _ 085(K140-0)0102(0) 1.000-2.000  131 2  _ 10 CO   940 97   5/16   63   61 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _  _ 48  _  _ 085(K140-0)0203(0) 2.000-3.246  121 1  _ 10 CO   940 96   5/16   62   63 4/03  _   _   _   _   _ 25  _ 25  _  _ 3.246 WCL BROOKVILLE   020 - 0.366 085(K140-0)0304(0) 3.246-4.267  121 1  _ 10 CO  1131 115  5/16   53   63 4/03  _   _   _   _   _ 23 03 13  _  _ 3.573 PERRY            020 - 0.039 4.267 ECL BROOKVILLE   021 - 0.332 085(K140-0)0405(0) 4.267-5.000  121 1  _ 10 CO  1146 115  5/16   56   62 4/03  _   _   _   _   _ 03 42 Crack  _ 085(K140-0)0506(0) 5.000-6.000  131 2  _ 10 CO  1145 117  5/16   54   61 4/03  _   _   _   _   _ 07 30 30  _  _ 085(K140-0)0607(0) 6.000-7.000  121 1  _ 10 CO  1145 117  5/16   53   56 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 42 13  _  _ 085(K140-0)0708(0) 7.000-8.000  121 1  _ 10 CO  1145 117  5/16   57   59 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 63 03  _  _ 085(K140-0)0809(0) 8.000-9.000  121 1  _ 10 CO  1145 117  5/16   59   56 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 28 03  _  _ 085(K140-0)0910(0) 9.000-10.000 121 1  _ 10 CO  1155 119  5/16   64   64 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 38 03  _  _  *  *  *  * * * * * 9.764 RS522            026 + 0.180 085(K140-0)1011(0) 10.000-11.000 121 1 _ 10 CO  1185 129  5/16   64   67 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 37 02  _  _  *  *  *  * * * * * 085(K140-0)1112(0) 11.000-12.000 121 1 _ 10 CO  1185 129  5/16   75   74 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 42 03  _  _ 085(K140-0)1213(0) 12.000-13.000 121 1 _ 10 CO  1185 129  5/16   74   66 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 20 15  _  _ 085(K140-0)1314(0) 13.000-14.000 121 1 _ 10 CO  1200 128  5/16   77   73 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 52 Crack  _ 13.764 RS1057           030 + 0.263 085(K140-0)1415(0) 14.000-15.000 121 1 _ 10 CO   845 124  5/16   86   65 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 67 03  _  _ 14.264 RS450            031 - 0.234 085(K140-0)1516(0) 15.000-16.525 121 1 _ 10 CO   700 120  5/16   78   69 4/03  _   _  17   _   _  _ 60 Crack  _ 085(K140-0)1616(0) 16.525-16.769 111 1 _ 10 CO  1193 139  5/16   89   92 4/03  _   _   _   _   _  _ 22 Crack  _  *  *  *  * * * * * 16.769 I135/K140        033 + 0.262