Talk:K-30 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 14:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

I am looking forward to working with you and hope that we can expedite completion of this review. Thanks. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Thank you for nominating this article. No disamb. or invalid external links.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A (prose):
 * Prose was concise and to the point.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * The David Rumsey map collection is a very nice historical tool. Should footnote 9 include its name as well as the name of the underlying map?
 * Sure, but I have no idea how.&mdash;  P C  B  15:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I have added it. If there is a better way, someone can always improve it. Racepacket (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. &mdash;  P C  B  16:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Is Kansas Highways Routelog a reliable source? Is it the source of your statements that K-30 was paved in 1953? (From the map alone, you can only say "by 1953.")
 * I added the 1952 map so "in 1953" would work. No it is not a reliable source.&mdash;  P C  B  15:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Article is appropriate for the subject.
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article represents significant work by its author, and only minor suggestion about sourcing and a possible RS question were raised. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article represents significant work by its author, and only minor suggestion about sourcing and a possible RS question were raised. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article represents significant work by its author, and only minor suggestion about sourcing and a possible RS question were raised. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)