Talk:K-41 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 05:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Thank you for nominating this article. No disamb. or invalid external links.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A (prose):
 * Lead: Please change Ottawa to Ottawa County.
 * At first I asked myself whether "city limits" was proper terminology, but I have verified that Delphos is a full city despite its population and size.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Although not a GA requirement, you might want to change to  so that it will appear in the category in the same sort order as the other highways.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * I have not seen any problems so far.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Any future construction plans? Any American Recovery Act projects? I assume not.
 * Would it be worth saying that K-41 is a two-lane highway its entire length?
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Although not a GA requirement, photographs of the highway are always nice to include.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe I have fixed these. There are no future plans that I can find a source for (or find at all.) &mdash;  P C  B  05:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Although not a GA requirement, photographs of the highway are always nice to include.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe I have fixed these. There are no future plans that I can find a source for (or find at all.) &mdash;  P C  B  05:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe I have fixed these. There are no future plans that I can find a source for (or find at all.) &mdash;  P C  B  05:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations on another Good Article. Racepacket (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)