Talk:K-60 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Dough 48  72  02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 I will place the article on hold for a couple concerns to be addressed.  Dough 48  72  02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Do not use "then" when describing progression of route in route description.
 * Removed instance of "then". &mdash;  P C  B  03:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Is a more exact establishment date for the road known?
 * I believe it is 1932 but I cannot verify this as I do not have a 1931 map. &mdash;  P C  B  03:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will now pass the article.  Dough 48  72  03:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)