Talk:KKK

Bold text
Do we really, really need this page to disambiguate the Bold textku klux klan from "Kataastaasang Kagalanggalangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan"?

Given that "KKK" refers the overwhelming majority of the time to the Ku Klux Klan, I vote to replace this page with a redirect to the Ku Klux Klan and include something like this on the Ku Klux Klan page:


 * ''KKK may also refer to the Kataastaasang Kagalanggalangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan.

...and then include the rest of the info on the Kataastaasang Kagalanggalangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan page.

Having this redirect here makes it more difficult to link to the Ku Klux Klan, since now one has to type KKK instead of KKK and frankly, I don't think it's worth the effort.

-Lalala 22:39, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Update: I now retract the above statements, now seeing that Kataastaasang Kagalanggalangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan has a page, given the fact that the disambiguation appears to have been made in good faith, and in accordance with Disambiguation and abbreviations. -Lalala 02:44, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

What the heck is Kylmä, Koho, Kompressio
Why was this added a while back? What is Kylmä, Koho, Kompressio?

More importantly what is it? A google search returns all non-english results.
 * I believe it is a Finnish phrase to help people remember a sequence of steps when performing CPR. --Dystopos 20:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Leave er to the vandals
Unless our fine organization promotes terrorists, I say that we leave this page as it is, and let it rot to the vandals. Cheers. --Jay (Reply)
 * Documenting isn't the same as promoting. Dystopos 04:55, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I understand. --Jay (Reply)

Scottish firm which sells falconry supplies
From WP:MOSDAB: ''External links should rarely, if ever, be given entries in disambiguation pages. Including them as comments or on a talk page is a way to mention URLs that might be helpful in the future. And also, Links to non-existent articles ("redlinks") may be included only when an editor is confident that an encyclopedia article could be written on the subject.''

I don't see that this is the case. Regarding the comment, "It is notable to European falconers, and this is about the only way for them toi find this information as web search for KKK drowns in refs to the KKKlan." First, they can be very easily found by Googling for KKK falconry; www.falconclubs.fsnet.co.uk comes up in the first page of search results. (Fewer than 1K Ghits, BTW) And second, Wikipedia is not a business directory and does not exist to enable obscure firms to be found more easily. If this falconry firm want to be found more easily, they can change their name. Unless they have been written about in the newspaper or in history books multiple times (e.g. for having the same name as the KKK, or some other reason), I don't think they deserve to be here; I don't see any reliable sources about them among the Ghits, and their page makes them look extremely non-notable.

(This has been discussed before; don't see that any response was provided that time to justify the inclusion.) cab 04:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Kool Aid
I've read through the Kool-Aid article, and there is nothing along the lines of 'Kool Kids Klub' which would refer its exemption under the search category of 'KKK'. Thanks, Aeryck89 18:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)