Talk:KLYT

Copyright issues
Nearly all of this article was copied from here. Rather than tag it for copyright violations and possibly have the article removed. I'm going to replace it with basic information about the station.--Rtphokie (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Wrong - the blog copied it from Wikipedia
Note the date of the blog posting and the date of the Wikipedia posting. The site will be restored with the original text. showing the history of the station, and its importance in the community and in the Christian music industry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shape Of Air (talk • contribs) 15:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

The above person is correct
I am the owner of thomasterry.com and I copied the original text from the wikipedia site and put it on my blog. - Tom Terry Contact me thru my website for verification.
 * Perhaps you should link to the wikipedia page instead of copying it?--Rtphokie (talk) 12:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Name? [This is off-topic from the page in question]
Could someone add the origin of the name "KLYT"? JREL (talk) 12:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The letters are the license of the station to transmit. I think that should be generally understandable, however if it's a disagreement, you're given all permission to make it clearer in the text/intro. --Puellanivis (talk) 22:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

That would explain the wide use of four-letter acronyms in U.S. radio station names. Is there an article on this? My search didn't throw up anything. Sounds like the kind of thing which would need some explanation. JREL (talk) 07:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Pretty much, also five-letter acronyms in US radio stations; regardless of length they all begin "W-" or "K-" as that is the international prefix given to American radio operators. I'm not sure if there is an article explaining the common usage in America of using the license as the name for the station... --Puellanivis (talk) 16:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed: No copyright violation
The blog used the material from Wikipedia. The evidence shows that to be true, and the blog owner confirmed it as well. Rtphokie seems to have been offended by this evidence, but this should not effect the ability of Wikipedia users to access the page. In light of this evidence, the entry should be restored as an original Wikipedia entry.

Copyright conclusions
As various contributors have noted here, the blog is dated April 13, 2006, at which point the article was already established. Furthermore, information in the blog reflects organic development in the article. Compare the article as established to its April 5, 2006 version, here. Note the change of the header from "The Christian Broadcasting Academy Years: 1975-2001" to "The Christian Broadcasting Academy Era: 1975-2001", the latter of which is reflected in the blog. Additionally telling details include the changing of the date from "Good Friday, 1977" to "Good Friday, 1978", and, of course, the addition of substantial material. These serve to confirm that the blog duplicated the article, rather than the other way around. The blog is compliant with GFDL in directly wikilinking the article. As no copyright violation can be substantiated, the material has been restored. I have merged the temporary subpage into the article and incorporated the new material as seemed appropriate. I leave it to the regular editors of this article to determine if and how that material should ultimately feature. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:PicturesInTheSky.jpg
The image Image:PicturesInTheSky.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --09:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)