Talk:KORB

Stub status
Two sentences are not sufficient for an article about a notable radio or television station. Certainly more can be found about the station's history, programming, personalities, and activitis within its community. This barely qualifies as a stub as far as I'm concerned... and an Infobox or a table should never stand alone without an explanation or a summary. B.Wind (talk) 20:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Being that this is the standard for brand new station articles, especially stations that started in 2008 (last year), this is as good as it gets. Any programming or personalities information would be removed instantly per WP:NOT, activities with the community would have to be referenced and with it being a new station, there probably aren't that many activities.  See WCCA-LP for another example of how these things work. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • January 30, 2009 @ 23:17
 * I've expanded the article based on news reports and the FCC database. Given that technical and licensing data is both the easiest information to find and the most critical information that can be provided, a new article about a broadcast station will often have a large, detailed infobox before the article itself is more than a paragraph or three long.  That data could, I suppose, be repeated in the prose of the article but that would be needless duplication and clutter for the sake of a fluffier text stream. - Dravecky (talk) 00:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Carmel translator
The Carmel translator was sold in late 2011 and moved to the commercial band, where it would no longer be permitted to use a non-off-air pickup. Presumably it now rebroadcasts a commercial station in the Carmel market. I've removed it from the list here. `121a0012 (talk) 04:13, 13 May 2012 (UTC)