Talk:KPHX

Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. - Dravecky (talk) 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KPHX.jpg
Image:KPHX.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

KPHX/Air America announcer: joke or for real ?
I've been living in Europe for 20 years and have recently begun listening to US radio via the Web. When I hear the announcer on KPHX/Air America, my reaction is "this has got to be a deliberate parody of what an American radio announcer sounds like," reasoning that it must be the station's way of marking its difference from a lot of the other talk radio that's out there via parody - going to such an extreme that the ridiculousness of that approach to announcing becomes obvious - rather than by using, say, an announcer who speaks quietly and reasonably to make it clear to listeners that this is a station for reasonable people.

Or is that guy for real? Have I been away too long? PS to the man in question: No offense intended; I'm just out of it I guess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lestrad (talk • contribs) 13:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KPHX.jpg
Image:KPHX.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Slightly non-encyclopedic language?
"the genius behind the music format" "continued this wonderful music format"

Ahem... Huw Powell (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

You are right...I toned it down. Thanks for your input ;) --Dogoftroy (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)