Talk:KXTX-TV/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Geardona (talk · contribs) 03:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Criteria
Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ;
 * (c) ; and
 * (d).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 :</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion
'''NOTE:This was on the Discord before we decided to re-enact it here, here's a little transcript and summary, if you want the full transcript, reach out to me. Geardona (talk to me?) 07:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)''' Notes/Questions round one: Lead is a little long In the lede "licensed to" or " licensed in"? in the first section thats a small image, is that for fair use reasons? The section names might need some workshopping.Geardona (talk to me?) 06:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * This one got funky, so I'll put what happened here:
 * MOS:LEAD puts the maximum length of a lead section at four paragraphs. This 4500-worder justifies it, in my opinion. We suffer, almost exclusively, from overly short leads.
 * "Licensed to" is the correct verbiage in this industry.
 * That first small image was moved down one level-2 header so I could bump up its upright to 1.4 from 1 without creating a high-level sandwich.
 * Changed some L2 and L3 headers to be a bit more encyclopedic (notably CBN and "Doubleday giveaway").
 * Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * After this (little more fluff) In the next image the caption says "DFW Airport" maybe expand the acronym? --> it got linked to the airport. Geardona (talk to me?) 07:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Then went toin "New studios in Fort Worth and news expansion" maybe some more inline sources, not all at the end (unless thats how the sourcing goes idk). Also WP:CITEOVERKILL --> the section got slightly altered. Geardona (talk to me?) 07:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Then wandered to increased the size of the images that are super horizontal and moved the one down one l2 header Then its the spot check. Then we are ✅ Geardona (talk to me?) 07:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Nice list for spot check
Spot checked sources Geardona (talk to me?) 06:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) 2 (not sure I fully understand it, but it looks correct (numbers add up and such));
 * 2) 7 (checked for copyvio as ell); 9 (no copyvio I can see, verified);
 * 3) 137 (technical data, verified)
 * 4) 75 ✅
 * 5) 79 ✅
 * 6) 84 ✅
 * 7) 71 ✅
 * 3 ✅
 * 1) 10 ✅
 * 2) 65 ✅
 * 3) 61 ✅
 * 4) 70 ❌ Source 404'ed
 * 5) 72 ✅
 * 6) 86 ✅
 * 7) 5 ❌ Source 404'ed
 * 6 ✅


 * @Geardona In re ref 70: I have the clipping of it at . In re ref 5: that's ProQuest's database containing Broadcasting, which TWL does not subscribe to. you need to cross-verify with another source that has Broadcasting. luckily, I know a guy...
 * Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)